0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
It doesn't matter if they are experienced or not, all that matters is if they choose the best possible person fit for the job. Including opinions from the wider community gives an idea for who they should choose. You're basically saying that we as the public can't let our viewpoints be heard by the Staff. Also, if the community votes someone in then that person will most likely do a better job of being a Moderator as they know that there are people that believe in that person to do a great job or else they wouldn't have voted for them.
all I'm saying is that the Admins should choose.
they just need to choose whoever they think is trustworthy and can handle the pressure alongside having a good Moderator application form.
Quote from: danniel1998 on 25 Feb 2012, 14:17:24they just need to choose whoever they think is trustworthy and can handle the pressure alongside having a good Moderator application form.So because someone has a good application? Hmm think if there was someone that was really good with English and Grammar and they applied, that would make Joe or someone choose them to be a moderator? As easy as that? No, that isn't the way things are on Noobstown, the application isn't everything, people can act trustworthy. Amanda is a great Mod, but don't get me wrong, she was accepted quite quickly because she had a good application, seemed loyal and trustworthy, luckily it was a great choice because she is the person who she told us she was, she's great at the job. The person who accepted Amanda as a Moderator was ultimately sure that she would be fit for the job, it wasn't just a random guess. What if that was to happen again, but this time it was people who voted, the person got promoted to Moderator and banned a lot of people? Yeah, it could be fixed and we'd all be unbanned, but that would be all of us put on MCBans and that isn't a good thing because people don't put as much trust into you as they could.